The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Indeed we don't have countries any more, we have markets. Most global corporations don't break down their numbers by country any more, we are all part of the EMEA (Europe, the Middle East and Africa) region. Profits are reported where taxes are the lowest, production is located where labour costs are lowest, and products are sold where they can command the highest prices.
And the thing is, nation states not big enough to dominate a market on their own haven't yet devised a strategy to combat this. Nationalism is the inchoate response, but it merely compounds the problem. The EU is the best solution we have, and even it has failed miserably. For all his incompetence, Hollande has delayed this process almost as well as any: France is still a functioning social democracy. As the UK is about to find out if it votes for Brexit, the alternative is even worse.
There is only one long term global solution, and that is for global political institutions to wrest control from global corporations, and that isn't even on any political agenda yet. For the foreseeable future we will live on democratic islands in a rising corporate sea. France, for now, is still one of the hold-outs. A returning Sarkozy wouldn't make that any better.
Index of Frank's Diaries
The post-war settlement was essentially brokered between the Gaullists, who held (mostly) the levers of power, with an able contesting partner accross the negotiating table in the persons of the PCF and the CGT. The post-war settlement and what was acheived in terms of social progress essentially was the result of that partnership, and in many aspects should probably be considered more a patriarchal capitalism, with a strong sense of social responsability, buttressed by a strong PCF and left unions who kept the other side honest.
The PS has always been the odd man out in this configuration, and its attempts to insert itself into the settlement in order to push the interests of its electorate (the PS is and pretty much always has been a petit bourgeois party, core electorate being functionaries and especially the corps of teachers) have been mostly contested by both the historical left and the right as well. Jérôme, a perfect representative of the PS view, would often joke with me about my party tendancy to "collaborate" with the right, this is a fairly strong current of opinion within the PS to decredibilise those to their left, with increasingly weak results.
Now, what we are seeing is that the PS insertion into that settlement is seen by popular opinion as illegitimate. This government, and not just Hollande, is plumbing the depths of democratic credibility, and in so doing is setting the stage for a crushing majority for a right which has shed its Gaullist sense of social responsability. And, in the extreme divisiveness the present government is employing in attempting to maintain legitimacy, it is consciously undermining the remnants of the actual left which contributed to the social post-war settlement, and which could actually continue to act as a counterpoint to the crushing majorities that the right parties are likely to enjoy in 10 months time.
France may look like a social democracy, but it really isn't one, and François Hollande's presidency, far from protecting the post-war settlement, is fatally undermining it. This is a reason for the street protests, the strikes without end. And it is the reason that Jean-Luc Mélenchon, imperfect as he is, is far more popular on the left than anyone associated with François Hollande or Manuel Valls.
In some ways this is similar to Ireland, where the ostensibly social democratic Labour party has rarely been anything other than a marginal player in national politics, and most of the actually social democratic policies have been implemented by Fianna Fail - the Irish Gaulist Party. It was Fianna Fail which initiated the building up of a large range of publicly owned semi-state enterprises in all sectors of the economy; the development of close union/government working arrangements through National Partnership agreements and the implementation of a good deal of social and employment law protections for workers as a result.
No one would call Fianna Fail a social democratic party, any more than the Gaulists, but we can see the degree to which their policies ended up with a distinctly social democratic tinge by the degree that their neo-liberal successors are now trying to dismantle their achievements of state led development and cooperation with leftist forces in society.
Index of Frank's Diaries
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 17 24 comments
by John Redmond - Jun 17 16 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 13 51 comments
by gmoke - Jun 15 5 comments
by DoDo - Jun 12 23 comments
by DoDo - Jun 5 68 comments
by generic - Jun 8 1 comment
by fjallstrom - Jun 8 1 comment
by John Redmond - Jun 1716 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 1724 comments
by gmoke - Jun 155 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 1351 comments
by DoDo - Jun 1223 comments
by Democrats Ramshield - Jun 104 comments
by generic - Jun 81 comment
by fjallstrom - Jun 81 comment
by DoDo - Jun 647 comments
by ARGeezer - Jun 617 comments
by DoDo - Jun 568 comments
by ARGeezer - Jun 270 comments
by das monde - Jun 222 comments
by John Redmond - May 3037 comments
by DoDo - May 2911 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 2620 comments
by ARGeezer - May 2522 comments
by gmoke - May 23
by gmoke - May 1518 comments